When to Use Ozone and Oxidizers
There is a lack of clarity about when to use oxidization therapies like ozone and hydrogen peroxide.
What is needed is clarity about:
1. what root causes oxidation addresses
2. what your root causes are exactly
3. how to know if your body can work with which oxidation therapy
4. how much at a particular time in balance with what nutrients.
Generally oxidizers work best against infection and chemical toxicity.
Anti-oxidants work best against metals, effects of electronic radiation, and chemicals.
You need to know because it’s a matter of balance and you can make things worse.
It’s a question of how much to oxidize versus anti-oxidize. Steal or donate electrons.
An expert on ozone Dr. Rowan, admitted he did not know “when to oxidize or reduce.” Reduce refers to antioxidants. There is a You Tube by him from the seminar I attended at the Silcon Valley Health Forum organized by Dave Asprey.
Dr Jack Kruse also said in an interview that he does not think most practitioners know when to use ozone and I agree. They appear to not understand basic theory fully and lack an adequate method to test individual needs. (I use energetic testing combined with symptoms and lab interpretation.)
To understand the underlying trade-off you have to understand how each kind of agent works:
Oxidizers steal electrons from infectious pathogens to kill them and from chemicals to break them up into harmless components.
Antioxidants or free radical scavengers donate electrons to neutralize toxins that could be chemicals or metals that are stealing electrons.
Similarly electronic pollution disrupts body chemistry that creates free radicals that can be neutralized with electrons.
The same chemical might be detoxified with either oxidation or anti-oxidation.
In general oxidative therapies must be more carefully targeted since they are potentially more destructive to healthy tissue. The body produces oxidizers like hydrogen peroxide to break down pathogens, or oxidizes to facilitate normal chemical reactions in a targeted way.
Antioxidants are associated with the body’s process of accumulating electrons as the source of energy. Electrons are thus of a more general benefit with less targeting needed. The sun with its photons creates electrons in the water of your body that charges the capillary walls to pull your blood through beyond the actions of the heart---few people know about this.
If you have to guess, I would forgo ozone and other oxidative therapies in favor of electrons. People who use oxidative therapies already generally know that you should balance with antioxidants at other times the day that do not neutralize ozone while it is active for a few hours.
Increasing electrons from the sun, far infrared, and electrolyte minerals requires less caution. However, taking antioxidant supplements has been shown to increase cancer. This may be due to the impure or imbalanced nature of concentrated supplements requiring other cofactors to be utilized, not just suppression of oxidizers. Natural processes are more balanced and self-regulating.
Energy in the body comes down to electrons. As Dr. Jack Kruse says, “the net negative charge of the cell” is the measure of energy of mitochondria. More electrons results in a negative charge, positively charged molecules are electron stealers.
On balance I favor increasing electrons by default and only oxidizing when you have enough information. If ozone or oxidizers have backfired you may now have an explanation.
What I have observed is that most chronically ill people have as root causes more of a toxic than infectious load.
Among toxicities, metals and EMF weigh more heavily in effects than chemical load, which can also be addressed with electrons or antioxidants.
Both these average trends suggest against using oxidizers that can steal electrons needed for the more important problem.
When chemicals like glyphosate and or infections are the largest root causes, then oxidizers can work relatively more effectively. Kerri Rivera’s protocol has used the weakest safest oxidizer, chlorine dioxide, successfully in some cases of autism. When this kind of therapy does not work, one should suspect other kinds of root causes. Conditions like autism or chronic fatigue are both actually varied and complex syndromes of causes and spectrums of symptoms unique to each individual.
Unfortunately many people are guessing that infection is their biggest root cause and are wrong. Infection may be a root cause, but not the biggest. Having an infection does not automatically explain illness. There is a bias from the medical paradigm that blames nature more than man-made toxicities, which are definitely the biggest problem. People often get infections after their immune systems is weak and this must be corrected through detox and nutrition as well.
Things are usually more complex than expected. Treatments have to be more customized and quantified than general protocols selected through guessing, shopping online and social media suggestions.
You can infer how much to do one or the other by measuring toxic load and infections through lab tests or energetic testing. Lab tests are more convincing to beginners and skeptics but are still a partial view of the problem. Energetic testing can be used to test both causes and identify the most effective solutions for the individual in detail: customized, quantified, with completeness determined by how many good questions you ask.
What is needed is clarity about:
1. what root causes oxidation addresses
2. what your root causes are exactly
3. how to know if your body can work with which oxidation therapy
4. how much at a particular time in balance with what nutrients.
Generally oxidizers work best against infection and chemical toxicity.
Anti-oxidants work best against metals, effects of electronic radiation, and chemicals.
You need to know because it’s a matter of balance and you can make things worse.
It’s a question of how much to oxidize versus anti-oxidize. Steal or donate electrons.
An expert on ozone Dr. Rowan, admitted he did not know “when to oxidize or reduce.” Reduce refers to antioxidants. There is a You Tube by him from the seminar I attended at the Silcon Valley Health Forum organized by Dave Asprey.
Dr Jack Kruse also said in an interview that he does not think most practitioners know when to use ozone and I agree. They appear to not understand basic theory fully and lack an adequate method to test individual needs. (I use energetic testing combined with symptoms and lab interpretation.)
To understand the underlying trade-off you have to understand how each kind of agent works:
Oxidizers steal electrons from infectious pathogens to kill them and from chemicals to break them up into harmless components.
Antioxidants or free radical scavengers donate electrons to neutralize toxins that could be chemicals or metals that are stealing electrons.
Similarly electronic pollution disrupts body chemistry that creates free radicals that can be neutralized with electrons.
The same chemical might be detoxified with either oxidation or anti-oxidation.
In general oxidative therapies must be more carefully targeted since they are potentially more destructive to healthy tissue. The body produces oxidizers like hydrogen peroxide to break down pathogens, or oxidizes to facilitate normal chemical reactions in a targeted way.
Antioxidants are associated with the body’s process of accumulating electrons as the source of energy. Electrons are thus of a more general benefit with less targeting needed. The sun with its photons creates electrons in the water of your body that charges the capillary walls to pull your blood through beyond the actions of the heart---few people know about this.
If you have to guess, I would forgo ozone and other oxidative therapies in favor of electrons. People who use oxidative therapies already generally know that you should balance with antioxidants at other times the day that do not neutralize ozone while it is active for a few hours.
Increasing electrons from the sun, far infrared, and electrolyte minerals requires less caution. However, taking antioxidant supplements has been shown to increase cancer. This may be due to the impure or imbalanced nature of concentrated supplements requiring other cofactors to be utilized, not just suppression of oxidizers. Natural processes are more balanced and self-regulating.
Energy in the body comes down to electrons. As Dr. Jack Kruse says, “the net negative charge of the cell” is the measure of energy of mitochondria. More electrons results in a negative charge, positively charged molecules are electron stealers.
On balance I favor increasing electrons by default and only oxidizing when you have enough information. If ozone or oxidizers have backfired you may now have an explanation.
What I have observed is that most chronically ill people have as root causes more of a toxic than infectious load.
Among toxicities, metals and EMF weigh more heavily in effects than chemical load, which can also be addressed with electrons or antioxidants.
Both these average trends suggest against using oxidizers that can steal electrons needed for the more important problem.
When chemicals like glyphosate and or infections are the largest root causes, then oxidizers can work relatively more effectively. Kerri Rivera’s protocol has used the weakest safest oxidizer, chlorine dioxide, successfully in some cases of autism. When this kind of therapy does not work, one should suspect other kinds of root causes. Conditions like autism or chronic fatigue are both actually varied and complex syndromes of causes and spectrums of symptoms unique to each individual.
Unfortunately many people are guessing that infection is their biggest root cause and are wrong. Infection may be a root cause, but not the biggest. Having an infection does not automatically explain illness. There is a bias from the medical paradigm that blames nature more than man-made toxicities, which are definitely the biggest problem. People often get infections after their immune systems is weak and this must be corrected through detox and nutrition as well.
Things are usually more complex than expected. Treatments have to be more customized and quantified than general protocols selected through guessing, shopping online and social media suggestions.
You can infer how much to do one or the other by measuring toxic load and infections through lab tests or energetic testing. Lab tests are more convincing to beginners and skeptics but are still a partial view of the problem. Energetic testing can be used to test both causes and identify the most effective solutions for the individual in detail: customized, quantified, with completeness determined by how many good questions you ask.
Find out what you get in a
Free Assessment
See how I support you fully:
Health Coaching Steps
I work over video: Facebook, Zoom, Google, from Michigan, USA
Hess.PaulC@gmail.com
Join me on Facebook where I blog post. FACEBOOK
Free Assessment
See how I support you fully:
Health Coaching Steps
I work over video: Facebook, Zoom, Google, from Michigan, USA
Hess.PaulC@gmail.com
Join me on Facebook where I blog post. FACEBOOK
